|
Post by luca on May 30, 2011 16:21:40 GMT -5
Gordon Hayward* SF 21 6'8'' 200 C+ B+ C+ C+ C B Anthony Randolph PF 22 6'11'' 220 B C C B+ C+ B Looking to upgrade my SF position, and I'm offering a package of Hayward, and Randolph to get that. Randolph is as versatile as a big man comes. He can play 3 positions, and is a great bench player, but also a good starter. He's still young, and has 1 camp left, so a team on the rebuild could use him to start, or a playoff team could bring him off their bench. As for Hayward, this kid is already an explosive offensive player. I've been carefully molding him too, so he's just going to get better. 2 camps left, and if you're a playoff team without much room for him, you could send him to the dleague again to get even better. But, if you're a rebuilding team, he will come in and score you some much needed points.
|
|
|
Post by RManske2 on May 30, 2011 21:33:01 GMT -5
Any interest in Tim Thomas?
|
|
|
Post by Hammer-Time on May 30, 2011 22:12:34 GMT -5
Jeb says al thornton could be you boy but i want Jonas
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 31, 2011 19:04:25 GMT -5
manske - sorry, but I'm lookin for someone younger than Thomas. jebs - nah, I got some better offers for Jonas, but he ain't movin atm. The point is to free up space at the 3 for a really good one by moving Hayward, and Randolph. I don't need more congestion at that position.
|
|
|
Post by Hammer-Time on May 31, 2011 20:06:49 GMT -5
thabo do anythin for ya?
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 31, 2011 22:03:39 GMT -5
I like Thabo. What's his defense at SF?
|
|
|
Post by Hammer-Time on May 31, 2011 22:15:06 GMT -5
idk if you could eat some of his contract he could be had for that package
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 31, 2011 22:43:02 GMT -5
I'll think about it. not really feeling that contract.
|
|
|
Post by Hammer-Time on Jun 1, 2011 18:05:39 GMT -5
i'd throw a bit of cash your way... that could be some nice shooting with Akyol and Thabos
|
|
|
Post by luca on Jun 11, 2011 14:02:40 GMT -5
bump
|
|