|
Post by ib4 on May 17, 2011 21:37:30 GMT -5
Cavs with the two giant jumps in the lotto!
So....
who goes number 1?
|
|
|
Post by dukefan on May 17, 2011 21:38:43 GMT -5
shits rigged
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 17, 2011 21:50:39 GMT -5
Stever and I are having a pretty intense argument over Irving/Williams on who should go number 1 overall
|
|
|
Post by GhostOfBrian on May 17, 2011 21:54:52 GMT -5
If i were in Cleveland's shoes i'd try and move up from 4 to 3 and get both. You take Williams at 1, think that maybe Kahn finally doesn't take a PG at 2 and poof, Irving sitting there at 3.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2011 21:57:28 GMT -5
If i were in Cleveland's shoes i'd try and move up from 4 to 3 and get both. You take Williams at 1, think that maybe Kahn finally doesn't take a PG at 2 and poof, Irving sitting there at 3. I hear T-Wolves are looking to get out of the spot, not sure that Williams really fits for the T-Wolves anyway.
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 17, 2011 21:58:16 GMT -5
If i were in Cleveland's shoes i'd try and move up from 4 to 3 and get both. You take Williams at 1, think that maybe Kahn finally doesn't take a PG at 2 and poof, Irving sitting there at 3. that would be the logical thing to do. But then again, Kahn defies logic. He'd probably take Irving 2nd.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2011 21:58:29 GMT -5
I mean they already got him on their roster
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2011 22:32:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by miketrain (aka Flipu8) on May 18, 2011 0:10:36 GMT -5
Cavs with the two giant jumps in the lotto! So.... who goes number 1? Think of the ceiling of both... Ceiling of Kyrie is CP3 Ceiling of Williams? A David West who can also play SF (unique) I'd say Kyrie no brainer
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 18, 2011 13:01:35 GMT -5
A lot of people are discrediting Williams. Why?
The guy has young Shawn Marion athleticism, with the ability to get to the rim, and step out and knock down the jumper. I see Shawn Marion written all over this kid.
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 18, 2011 13:16:42 GMT -5
Apparently Utah is hell bent on drafting Enes Kanter at number 3.
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 18, 2011 14:12:37 GMT -5
Apparently Utah is hell bent on drafting Enes Kanter at number 3. smh. That would be a waste of a pick. The jazz should trade up if they want Kanter. Then again, I said the same thing when they chose Gordon Hayward so early on last season, and he's showing signs of becoming a really good NBA player. The Jazz do have amazing scouts, so maybe they see something in Kanter that could warrant his being selected 3rd overall. But, I think there are better choices at 3 than a slow Turk with bad knees.
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 18, 2011 14:21:11 GMT -5
Stever also argued back in 2008 that the Bulls "already had Gordon and Hinrich and don't need another guard (Rose) so they should draft Beasley hands-down"
But he acknowledges now that he was wrong in that regard, but this time around, "Irving is no Rose, what's so special about Irving anyway?"
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 18, 2011 14:26:38 GMT -5
Apparently Utah is hell bent on drafting Enes Kanter at number 3. smh. That would be a waste of a pick. The jazz should trade up if they want Kanter. Then again, I said the same thing when they chose Gordon Hayward so early on last season, and he's showing signs of becoming a really good NBA player. The Jazz do have amazing scouts, so maybe they see something in Kanter that could warrant his being selected 3rd overall. But, I think there are better choices at 3 than a slow Turk with bad knees.Hell, you could argue they already have a better one on their team! I don't see what the hype is over Kanter, and haven't all season. Not sure what's so special about him - average height, strength etc... not a physical beast, yet fundamentally sound.
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 18, 2011 15:54:49 GMT -5
smh. That would be a waste of a pick. The jazz should trade up if they want Kanter. Then again, I said the same thing when they chose Gordon Hayward so early on last season, and he's showing signs of becoming a really good NBA player. The Jazz do have amazing scouts, so maybe they see something in Kanter that could warrant his being selected 3rd overall. But, I think there are better choices at 3 than a slow Turk with bad knees.Hell, you could argue they already have a better one on their team! I don't see what the hype is over Kanter, and haven't all season. Not sure what's so special about him - average height, strength etc... not a physical beast, yet fundamentally sound. Also, there is the fact that he has never played a collegiate game, and his senior season at some Cali HS was pretty sub-par. I mean, if you can't get it done at the HS level, and have proven nothing in the college ranks, then how is it he's being looked at with the 3rd pick, let alone the 10th?
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 18, 2011 15:55:17 GMT -5
also, lol @ the Okur reference.
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 18, 2011 17:25:27 GMT -5
Hell, you could argue they already have a better one on their team! I don't see what the hype is over Kanter, and haven't all season. Not sure what's so special about him - average height, strength etc... not a physical beast, yet fundamentally sound. Also, there is the fact that he has never played a collegiate game, and his senior season at some Cali HS was pretty sub-par. I mean, if you can't get it done at the HS level, and have proven nothing in the college ranks, then how is it he's being looked at with the 3rd pick, let alone the 10th? Exactly - the dude is one gigantic question mark. No substantial production at any level. What's he been doing the past year? I read something about him staying in shape at his old high school, or maybe it was Ohio state itself.. not sure. but wtf, the dude hasn't been on the basketball court in over a year, and not one game of college ball.. I'm lost man, just lost.
|
|
|
Post by GhostOfBrian on May 18, 2011 17:39:15 GMT -5
He could wind up like Martynas Andriuskivicius or whatever his name was. During the early phases of scouting for the draft people were going gaga for the guy and it quickly faded.
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 20, 2011 8:01:15 GMT -5
They're comparing that Jan Vessley guy to a more athletic AK in his prime...would the Jazz consider him to learn from the real AK with the 3rd pick?
i dunno, some mock drafts have the Jazz taking Kemba or Knight....so i guess they just really dont like Harris moving forward....
|
|
|
Post by RManske2 on May 21, 2011 0:32:58 GMT -5
Just pencil the Timberwolves in for another point guard, or maybe even Jimmer...
|
|
|
Post by GhostOfBrian on May 23, 2011 10:55:54 GMT -5
They're comparing that Jan Vessley guy to a more athletic AK in his prime...would the Jazz consider him to learn from the real AK with the 3rd pick? i dunno, some mock drafts have the Jazz taking Kemba or Knight....so i guess they just really dont like Harris moving forward.... The real AK isn't under contract I think both of those guys and Harris can play off the ball, could probably play WITH Devin. And when your team is in a position like Utah currently is, you go withthe bpa and sort it out afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 23, 2011 13:44:45 GMT -5
They're comparing that Jan Vessley guy to a more athletic AK in his prime...would the Jazz consider him to learn from the real AK with the 3rd pick? i dunno, some mock drafts have the Jazz taking Kemba or Knight....so i guess they just really dont like Harris moving forward.... I've been reading DA's draft page and he's been saying that a lot of exec's are discrediting Donatas Motiejunas' work ethic and are penciling him in to be no more than a Bargnani - all offense and no defense. They're also "saying" Jan Vesely is supremely head and shoulders over Donatas at this point. I think Donatas goes late lottery, Vesely becoming the Draft day stud going somewhere in the top 5. On another point; Raptors looking to go "big" with the 5th pick. Looking to take a Center that PLAYS DEFENSE
|
|
|
Post by GhostOfBrian on May 23, 2011 14:02:23 GMT -5
Some of Ford's notes from the Combine: Just a few for you non-ESPN Insider folks
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 23, 2011 14:22:28 GMT -5
I found this really interesting about Kawhi Leonard:
"With a wingspan some 9 inches longer than he is tall at 6-6, Leonard has one of the most unique physical profiles in this class. His hands, as expected, are absolutely gigantic, ranking him amongst 7'0 foot centers in terms of hand width and length. His 7-3 wingspan is amongst the largest ever for a player 6-6 or under. Leonard's 227-pound frame actually weights in heavier than many of the power forwards in this class, which only adds to sentiments that he'll be able to guard the power forward position for stretches at the next level."
He could really turn out to be an awesome defensive force. That wingspan is ridiculous for a SF. Rumblings of Artest are swirling around the camps
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 23, 2011 14:23:49 GMT -5
Brian - I find it funny how Ford says Walker measured bigger than expected, yet in the combine notes, it's saying he measures 5'10 without shoes.
|
|
|
Post by GhostOfBrian on May 23, 2011 15:23:15 GMT -5
Brian - I find it funny how Ford says Walker measured bigger than expected, yet in the combine notes, it's saying he measures 5'10 without shoes. 6'1 in shoes. I think people were worried he was gonna be like 5'11 in shoes. He's just relaying comments from scouts and GMs for the most part there.
|
|
|
Post by mgcoug2 on May 23, 2011 16:40:50 GMT -5
Did somebody really suggest Irving's ceiling was CP3 LOL
I like a few guys in this draft and I disagree with Luca on Kanter who I think will be a solid pro, but I don't see any perennial all stars although history tells us one or two will emerge from nowhere in any given draft
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 23, 2011 16:55:00 GMT -5
I heard that Serge Ibaka, if he were in this draft, "would be the UNANIMOUS number 1 overall pick"
is this class really that weak? nothing against Serge
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 23, 2011 17:10:49 GMT -5
Did somebody really suggest Irving's ceiling was CP3 LOL I like a few guys in this draft and I disagree with Luca on Kanter who I think will be a solid pro, but I don't see any perennial all stars although history tells us one or two will emerge from nowhere in any given draft Hey, I hope I'm wrong about Kanter, because I always like to see guys do well. But, he is not top 5 imo. Maybe worth a shot in the top 10, but even then... I also see Biombo going top 5.
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 23, 2011 17:14:03 GMT -5
lol meant top 10 w/ Biombo.
|
|