|
|
Post by pitch2barrysf on Jun 21, 2010 13:56:41 GMT -5
Anyway to add more characters to our signature too?
|
|
|
|
Post by luca on Jun 21, 2010 14:07:55 GMT -5
cool - MJ watch.
and yeah, it would be cool if we could add more characters to our sigs.
|
|
|
|
Post by GhostOfBrian on Jun 21, 2010 14:19:53 GMT -5
MJ Watch 99... Jordan was spotted at a downtown Chicago nightclub triple-teaming some bimbo with Charles Oakley and Brad Sellers.
More on that as it comes in.
|
|
|
|
Post by slash on Jun 21, 2010 18:35:54 GMT -5
i'll look into the sig stuff.. as i've mentioned i'm pretty new with proboards, but i'll check the proboards boards.
|
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 9, 2011 10:06:19 GMT -5
I decided to pin this thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 11, 2011 8:42:52 GMT -5
what do you people think about In-Season MLE's?
thoughts....
|
|
|
|
Post by cashmoney on May 11, 2011 10:32:51 GMT -5
what do you people think about In-Season MLE's? thoughts.... Eh maybe. Would definitely have to have a fee attached to it. Would have to be comparable to a TEs or more because teams would use that to help match contracts in trading instead of using TEs. Also still keep the fee of actually moving an MLE. |
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 11, 2011 11:52:54 GMT -5
this could eliminate TE's alltogether. Either use all or up to $4.5mil for any in-season FA signing. as long as you didn't use your MLE in the offseason.
|
|
|
|
Post by FUPA on May 11, 2011 12:23:00 GMT -5
I like it, would we do away with the cost of trading an MLE? Either way, I think its a good idea, and should replace TEs
|
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 11, 2011 12:30:51 GMT -5
i hate TE's, btw. messes things up
|
|
|
|
Post by mgcoug2 on May 11, 2011 12:33:14 GMT -5
if we do this why not just make it so you can offer multiyear mle's for a fee if you sign the guy to an MLE you can extend it out etc... Furthermore if we do this how do you plan on going with the nba rule that a team that starts the season under the cap cannot use an mle that offseason etc etc
just food for thought
|
|
|
|
Post by cashmoney on May 11, 2011 13:04:26 GMT -5
if we do this why not just make it so you can offer multiyear mle's for a fee if you sign the guy to an MLE you can extend it out etc... Furthermore if we do this how do you plan on going with the nba rule that a team that starts the season under the cap cannot use an mle that offseason etc etc just food for thought Good point |
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 11, 2011 13:07:55 GMT -5
no multi year MLE's....we already have that "year after MLE" thing where guys can already offer up to 5.4 mil that people always do anyway....
but I would probably include the stipulation that if you start the season under salary cap, no in-season MLE
|
|
|
|
Post by mgcoug2 on May 11, 2011 13:27:36 GMT -5
I think this is just getting messier which means more headaches for ray and if the solution is getting rid of TE's so be it or have the only TE's be generated by team with cap space taking a player back for less like real life (Also probably too much work) I have no problem with just getting rid of TE's completely
|
|
|
|
Post by mgcoug2 on May 11, 2011 13:28:59 GMT -5
New complaint
GMs who passively express interest yet are incapable of making offers
You know who you are
|
|
|
|
Post by cashmoney on May 11, 2011 15:41:53 GMT -5
New complaint GMs who passively express interest yet are incapable of making offers You know who you are x2 or look too much into letter ratings then actual production |
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 11, 2011 16:36:25 GMT -5
...or try to run the "used car salesman" game on you like you're some dumbass who just crawled out from under a rock in Siberia. Or better yet, try to strong-arm you into agreeing to a deal after you've told them "no" 20,000 times.
|
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 11, 2011 19:41:23 GMT -5
Or the ones that simply have no clue??
|
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 11, 2011 19:43:19 GMT -5
By the way, why siberia? I'd think they'd be accustomed to living under rocks/in caves because it's so barren, therefore making the normal person, a rock dweller. I think a place where rocks are less familiar (the rainforest?) would be a better assessment because only stupid people with an actual choice would decide to live under a rock.
Just sayin
There's my complaint for the thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by miketrain (aka Flipu8) on May 11, 2011 19:44:29 GMT -5
...or try to run the "used car salesman" game on you like you're some dumbass who just crawled out from under a rock in Siberia. yes yes yes yes... I can understand being underwhelmed by an offer, but disrespected by an offer is another thing |
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 11, 2011 20:08:14 GMT -5
By the way, why siberia? I'd think they'd be accustomed to living under rocks/in caves because it's so barren, therefore making the normal person, a rock dweller. I think a place where rocks are less familiar (the rainforest?) would be a better assessment because only stupid people with an actual choice would decide to live under a rock. Just sayin There's my complaint for the thread. lol who gives a shit? |
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on May 12, 2011 12:01:14 GMT -5
What the hell happened here?
|
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 20, 2011 18:47:12 GMT -5
By the way, why siberia? I'd think they'd be accustomed to living under rocks/in caves because it's so barren, therefore making the normal person, a rock dweller. I think a place where rocks are less familiar (the rainforest?) would be a better assessment because only stupid people with an actual choice would decide to live under a rock. Just sayin There's my complaint for the thread. lol who gives a shit?  The whole point |
|
|
|
Post by RManske2 on May 21, 2011 0:31:37 GMT -5
What's wrong with the used car salesman...?  |
|
|
|
Post by luca on May 26, 2011 19:42:01 GMT -5
The whole point uh huh yea, I'm sure that's what you were trying to say all along. lol. |
|
|
|
Post by kmatrixg on May 27, 2011 9:55:33 GMT -5
The whole point uh huh yea, I'm sure that's what you were trying to say all along. lol.  |
|
